 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
|
Divorce Lawyers Las VegasFebruary 14, 2008Modification ProperWhere petitioner did not contend that the trial court’s order was, in fact, a modification of maintenance or support, the order at issue could only affect the property disposition contained in the judgment; thus, the trial court had jurisdiction to enter an order modifying the property disposition only if conditions existed which would justify the reopening of a judgment as in other civil cases. No CommentsNo comments yet. RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time. |
|
Powered by WordPress
 |
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Before Filing
1 After Filing |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2008 Divorce Lawyers Las Vegas
This website contains legal information, and not legal advice. It's content refers only to the law of the State of Nevada. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
   |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
