Real Property
A lien by one spouse on the stock of a closely held corporation owned by the other spouse, which was held in escrow upon court order, was sufficient to secure a spouse’s property interest until the property judgment awarded to that spouse was satisfied.
Where respondent had provided for the needs of his children since the separation, and there was no indication that he would not continue to do so in the future, respondent’s estate would be liable for future support “to the extent just and appropriate under the circumstances,” and should he otherwise fail to provide for them, there was no reason to believe that respondent, or his estate would not have been able to provide the support mandated, and respondent had ample assets apart from the pension and profit sharing plan to provide all the necessary support, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to require that respondent furnish security for his support obligations.
